READ THE BITNODES LIVE MAP IN DE

-



 

  


Here's a structured analysis of the provided Bitnodes live map data:


### **Network Overview**

- **Top Networks**: 

  - Autonomous Systems (AS) listed: `AS7922`, `AS49592`, `AS49590`, `AS49640`, `AS16276`. These represent network operators hosting Bitcoin nodes.

  - `TDB` likely stands for "To Be Determined" (placeholder for unclassified networks).


---


### **Node Locations**

Listed nodes with IP:port combinations and locations, though many entries have formatting issues:

- **Valid Examples**:

  - `70.48.26.61:8333` → Labeled "Level Canada" (likely typo in IP formatting).

  - `63.143.99.243:8333` → Labeled "Kingston/Jamaica".

- **Suspicious Entries**:

  - `1085.4,71.71:8333` → Invalid IPv4 format (octet exceeds 255).

  - `1,234,244.96:8333` → Commas misused (possibly intended as `1.234.244.96:8333` for Gangnam-gu/Korea).

  - `146,70,149.42:8333` → Likely meant to be `146.70.149.42:8333` (Singapore).


---


### **Client Version Distribution**

- **Satoshi Client Versions** (Bitcoin Core):

  - `Satoshi:28.0.0` → **26.06%** dominance.

  - Older versions: `27.1.0` (12.65%), `26.0.0` (9.27%), and `25.0.0` (5.68%).

  - Total nodes: **883,421** (repeated value, possibly a placeholder).


---


### **Top User Agents**

- `Satoshi:25.0.0` → **5.68%** of nodes (matches the version distribution above).


---


### **Anomalies**

1. **Invalid Coordinates/IPs**:

   - `14.42,101.423:8333` → Latitude exceeds 90° (invalid).

   - `121.98,22.147:8` → Port `8` is non-standard (Bitcoin uses port `8333`).

2. **Fake Domain**:

   - `Lizhovuashinethroberinn6x4kzeterb5cqha7wzayaSalaxyfff6lgyl.combn:8333` → `.combn` is not a valid TLD.

3. **Future Date**:

   - Network availability timestamp: `Wed Feb 12 11:51:10 2025` (likely a typo).


---


### **Key Metrics**

- **Consensus Height**: **883,421** (latest agreed blockchain block).

- **Network Availability**: **18,856 nodes** (possibly active at the time of snapshot).

- **App Count**: **37,035** (unclear metric, possibly related to applications or connections).


---


### **Conclusion**

The data appears to be a mix of valid node statistics and test/placeholder entries with formatting errors. Real-world Bitnodes data would include accurate IPs, valid locations, and current timestamps. The inconsistencies suggest this might be synthetic or corrupted data for demonstration purposes.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Here's how to interpret the **Bitnodes Live Map** for trading insights, inspired by unconventional methods like Waqar Zaka's approach (note: no direct link to his strategy exists in search results, but we’ll focus on actionable node data analysis):

-
--- ### **1. Understand Key Metrics on Bitnodes**   The live map shows real-time Bitcoin node distribution, which can reflect network health and regional adoption. Key metrics to track:   - **Node Concentration**: High node density in regions like the US (9.98%), Germany (6.12%), or France (2.48%) suggests strong network participation, possibly correlating with market activity .   - **User Agents**: Dominant versions like `Satoshi:28.0.0` (26.06%) indicate software upgrades, which may signal network upgrades or miner confidence .   - **Network Types**: ~64% of nodes use Tor (`.onion`), suggesting privacy-focused activity, while cloud providers like Hetzner (4.27%) highlight centralized hosting trends .   --- ### **2. Correlate Node Data with Market Trends**   - **Network Health**: A rising node count (e.g., 21,869 nodes tracked) often signals network resilience, which could precede bullish sentiment .   - **Geopolitic...
Read more

To **read Bitnodes Live Map data in detail**, **connect it with numerology**, and **create trading signals (long or short)** for Bitcoin, follow this comprehensive guide:

-
  --- ### **1. Understanding Bitnodes Live Map Data** The Bitnodes Live Map provides real-time insights into the Bitcoin network, including node distribution, network health, and geographic trends. Here’s how to interpret it: #### **Key Metrics to Analyze** - **Node Distribution**:     - Geographic clusters (e.g., U.S. has ~10.2% of nodes, Germany ~6.22%, and France ~2.46%) indicate regional adoption and network strength .     - The "n/a" category (64.20%) represents nodes using Tor or VPNs, highlighting privacy-focused participation . - **Node Types**:     - **IPv4 vs. IPv6 vs. Tor**: IPv4 nodes dominate (29.44%), while Tor nodes (64.20%) show growing privacy adoption .     - **Full vs. Pruned Nodes**: Full nodes (91.83%) validate transactions, while pruned nodes (8.14%) save disk space but still contribute to network security . - **Network Health**:     - **Uptime and Latency**: High uptime (50th percentil...
Read more